Wednesday, December 31, 2014

The events of 2014 in review

The year 2014 is crucially remarkable overwhelmed by a series of crisis that occurs simultaneously unlike other years in the past as many world leaders labeled the year as the most challenging era in our time. In general, the major events thought to be the most provoking are Ukraine Crisis, Israel-Gaza conflict, the outbreak of Ebola, the immediate rise of Islamic caliphate, World Cup, the missing Malaysian airline and its shooting down over the eastern region of Ukraine. Minor events are hostage of hundreds of school girls by Boko Haram in Nigeria, the FIFA’s scandal, the hostage siege in Sydney and the crash of AirAsia’s plane. However, people are a bit relieved by shrinking the oil price across the globe amid the raging conflicts by the end of the year—thanks to the soaring business of oil in the United States. In this repeatedly globalizing era, a small event can easily spark the light all over the world within minutes as the events of 2014 witness. Some are reflected as the following;

Ukraine Crisis

The crisis facing Ukraine is partly because of the game of geopolitics played by Mr. Putin, the imperialist-minded president of Russia. This crisis is in place between Russia and Ukraine even though the eastern rebels are just a puppet. Logically speaking, those who support corruption are corrupted, too. And so is Russia for supporting the corrupted Viktor Yanukovych which is the starting point of the line. The western governments put blame on Mr. Putin, accusing of orchestrating the crisis by providing the rebel groups with military hardware and sophisticated weapons that the rebels can never afford to buy by their own capacity. The west blessed him with heavy sanctions in response to his political conduct in Ukraine; seizing territory and was believed to engineer the war and refused to investigate the shooting down of civilian airliner. In retrospect, Russia is never late counter-blaming the west for supporting Ukraine, particularly US as the sole player of the Ukrainian crisis in a bid to reduce the Russia’s sphere of influence. Despite all this, Putin’s popularity at home is soared following the annexation of Crimea from Ukraine. At this point, the Russian people, as the Economist observed, are foolish enough to trade prosperity for nationalistic favour. The Kremlin’s administration always suppressed dissent, squeezed out opposition and controlling the media by the ingredients of patriotism and ultra-nationalism. The unwillingness to help solve the shooting down of Malaysian Airline consolidated a heavier sanction.

Critically, Putin is very unwise as he failed to see the consequences of his aggressive actions. As the saying goes “ye shall reap as ye sow”, the collapse in the ruble is for now caused by his belligerence, greed and paranoia. Against the backdrop, the Kremlin’s administration will be again overshadowed by kleptocracy in the future. For many political scientists and experts in the west figured out this crisis as a tactic tested against the Obama’s administration by Vladimir Putin. The crisis appears to be prolong if left unsolved in early of 2015. And Russia and Ukraine are key to tackling this nationalistic issue rather than the involvement of the west. Both of the countries do need to realize that thousands of lives have been lost and insisting on their national interest will mean further escalation of civil war. The optimistic hope is that the fall of Russian economy can eventually persuade the Kremlin to the productive conclusion.

The Israeli-Gaza conflict

The conflict between Israel and Gaza can be quelled only for a short time. The light can be started any time because they had on-and-off conflicts in the past. The Israeli-Gaza conflict in 2014 was all about Hamas militant group and Israel. The rocket fire from Hamas militants in Gaza and a heavy response of air strikes from Israel after the abduction and killing of three Israeli teenagers sparked the all-out war. In that civilians were confined and suffering a great loss. It took 22 days to put an end to the conflict. What are the real issues behind the war? Hamas’s charter is committed to Israel’s destruction and Israel’s top priority is to defend its territory from militants’ attacks. Part of Hamas’s launching attacks against Israel is, assessed by some analysts, that Hamas feel isolated and losing support from its main allies such as Egypt, Syria and Iran, because of political changes. And the only way they presume to gain support is to attack Israel at the expense of civilian casualty. Such is the rogue and stupid strategy. The demands from the two sides can hardly be met. Hamas wants Israel to lift the imposed restrictions on the movement of goods and people in and out of Gaza Strips whilst the Netanyahu’s administration made clear that they wanted Gaza or Hamas to be demilitarized at all for the safety of Israeli citizens. At the height of uncertainty, Egypt came as a rescuer, brokering the ceasefire agreement between the parties that finally halted the conflict. With that being achieved, everyone knows that it would not last long, though.  

Since the founding of the Israel state in 1947, history proves that whoever war waged against Israel will receive more or less supports from the Islamic countries. So far, no leader in the world can help solve the problems faced by Israel and its neighbors on a permanent deal. After all in all, the world hope that Gaza will be well rehabilitated in 2015 after getting more than six billion donations from wealthy countries and Israel will be in peace, but the unexpected phenomenon can swing back Israel into another game of conflict in the very near future.  

The Outbreak of Ebola:

The epidemic disease of Ebola, starting in West Africa, claimed 7,800 lives. The response toward the deadly disease was very slow. It was due to the density of a number of crisis challenging big countries, who are the decision makers in the Security Council at United Nations. The one who died first of this disease was a toddler named as Emile Ouamouno a family member of Etienne before spreading to his sister Philomene on Christmas Day in 2013 and passed away before New Year, then spread again to other members of community in Guinea. It was later recognized as Ebola in March this year after it began to spread across international borders. Scientists believe that the toddler before his death had been near a tree harbouring the free-tailed bats. Fruit bats are the commonly suspected carriers of Ebola virus and believed to have been linked with the previous outbreak of Ebola in Africa.

On a more basic level, one of the solutions among many in tackling the Ebola outbreak is to fight against poverty. Because the rich countries can afford for treatment whereas the poverty-stricken West African countries can hardly survive from deadly disease. This Ebola outbreak leaves the world with a great lesson that a united hand is much needed in countering the challenges lie ahead.

The rise of Islamic Caliphate or ISIS versus Boko Haram:

The brutal scene of killing innocent people in public and in sight of children shocked the world. This is the emblem of ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham) on the world stage. Skeptically at one point, when the Islamic caliphate emerged in Iraq, it is surprising to learn that the Muslim countries are not blaming them except for the victimized countries, Iraq and Syria. There are many theories and conspiracies swirling around the rise of these extremist groups. Some say this is the counterproductive of US’s invasion of Iraq. On the other side, some analysts suggest that the caliphate is a political or religious idea linked back to the history of Ottoman Empire.

In the case of Boko Haram, the corrupted government of Nigeria showed no will to help ease the pain of families of victims when the extremist group abducted more than 220 school girls. At later stage, the government took actions and running after the group in the north after facing domestic and international uproar. The groups claimed to have affiliated with ISIS.

When it comes to the US role in marauding ISIS, the Obama’s administration was deliberately delayed responding to this campaign, insisting that it was the inside issue of Iraqi government and pressuring the Nouri al-Maliki’s administration to relinquish power. The US feared that the effect of isolating Sunni group can only wreak havoc in the fragile Iraqi political spectrum. Finally, under a high volume of pressures from international partners and his own Shiite political party, Mr. Maliki made concession, but it was too late after ISIS capturing a large swathe of areas.

In reality, decades after spending trillions of dollars on the two-war fronts, Afghanistan and Iraq, US has been truly weary of war. And United States is prudent enough to form coalition forces in the fight of ISIS. The battle is ongoing and will be going for some time, but the strength of ISIS have been more and more sipped through the unceasing launching of drone and airstrike campaign by coalition forces with the support of Iraqi government and Kurdish Peshmerga forces.

To calculate the impact toward transnational borders, there is no greater fear than ISIS was recruiting foreign fighters via the use of social media, and an immediate propaganda campaign was staged in order to carry out attacks on foreign soils, which is translated as transnational terrorism. Cyber issue become an intensified attention of the international leaders and experts alike. ISIS with a combination of international fighters and its sympathizers are a threat to the world in general. And the prospect of handling those returning home is a more challenging. At the start, the victories of ISIS were celebrated across the globe by its supporters and fanatic groups, including those in Indonesia and Malaysia. Such occurrences are a reminder of how the governments need to be well prepared ahead.

Academic experts suggest that it is common to see the rise of extremism whenever the force of instability pushing hard the weak states. And there is similarity with what happened to ISIS as the Islamic groups are exploiting the weak states of Iraq and Syria through the channel of Arab Spring. With all concerted efforts, ISIS, however, would be exterminated in the foreseeable future. Their immediate rise left questions. At the end, the countries that need to learn lessons most from ISIS are neither the western nor eastern countries, but the Arab countries.

Shooting Down and Mystery of Missing Malaysian Airlines

Malaysia was struck by the worst tragedy in history, losing its largest airliners; one was shot down and another missing with no ability to track down so far. For record, Malaysian airline is among the top 20 largest airliner in the world.

The shooting down of Malaysian airline in the airspace of sovereign Ukraine became an added problem to the existing crisis in Ukraine. From the view point of laws, shooting down commercial airline without giving warning first  and where there is no fly zone designated, no matter the battle is raging, is a violation of international laws. A number of news agencies provided details of how Russia handed the Buk missile to pro-Russian rebels in eastern Ukraine.

And the disappearance of MH-370 is one of the great mysteries in aviation history. There are plenty of conspiracies giving assumption from communications made between pilots and ground stations to the captain’s frustration towards the result of Malaysian election, yet nothing can explain us to date. The search is going on in the southern part of Indian Ocean with the hope of finding the track.  


Sports: World Cup, FIFA 

The 2014 World Cup reminded us that none of any countries should attempt to bid for hosting world cup without knowing its own capacity. On the match days of World Cup, the scene of work in progress was widely seen and there was tickets returned due to stadium not being fit for audiences. It was a shame to people of Brazil as well.

Following the chaotic moments during world cup coupled with the allegation of corruption in awarding Russia and Qatar hosting World Cup in 2018 and 2022, there come the scandals revealed in British media agencies. What is mostly striking is the disclosure of how FIFA’s structural organization and leadership are deeply disorganized and corrupted. FIFA has billions of dollars benefit per year, yet it was registered as non-profit organization, which means FIFA must be tax-exempted. Furthermore, leaderships on the top are rampant with corruption as it has longstanding reputation for it. Although there are plenty someone can do within 20 years of leadership on the top, Sepp Blatter, president of FIFA never attempted to make any reforms, but stupidly attempting to grip the power by bidding again the seat of presidency for the fifth times. This is the real drama of a revealing corruption, meaning that Mr. Blatter tries to run the FIFA during his lifetime. Some critics say he is no better than Muammar Gadaffi of Lybia, Kim Jun-Un of North Korea.

Corruption and scandal cases if not solved as early possible as it could damage the reputation of the world’s most watched entertainment sport in the future.  

The concluding events of the year:

The sudden fall of Phillips Huges, an Australian cricketer while playing Cricket in Sydney shocked a great wave of sadness accompanied by the hostage siege again in the Lindt café in Sydney that questions the legal system in Australia, the collapse of Russian economy thanks to the plummeting of oil prices and the Sony hack in which the Obama's administration accused of North Korea for masterminding the act, and the tragic crash of AirAsia plane, which cost 162 lives in inland sea while en route to Singapore from Surabaya in Indonesia.

What teaches us from the events of 2014:

The year 2014 is a doom for world leaders because the conflict, crisis and tragedies occurring are concurrent in parallel. Of all, the most dangerous event of the year assumed is Ukraine crisis for it is all about the game of geopolitics. It is simply because it can turn the world into another Great War. At some points, some rushed to predict that “we are back to Cold War period” based on Mr. Obama’s accusing of Mr. Putin as having Cold War mentality. The root cause of geopolitics, as we can define by today measure, is the effect of hyper-nationalism and ultra-patriotism. These are, of course, extremely dangerous.

Looking at the world’s reactions towards Russia, China has been careful of handling the South China Sea dispute, having being well aware of the consequences awarded by international community. The tone of imperialist president Xi during his speech delivered in Australian parliament while attending G-20 summit in Brisbane was a gesture of great wisdom learnt from the mistakes of Russia, the main ally of China.

Secondly, the Islamic militant in Middle East, esp, ISIS reached the pinnacle of extremism. These militants are the most atrocious and brutal groups recorded in modern history. It is in fact the problem of Middle East. On critically assessing, the actual actors in countering ISIS should be the Arab world, not putting the challenges on the shoulder of US nor the European states as stated earlier. Central to this idea, the undying war happening in the Middle East is between the Shiite and Sunni and this seems to be on the go. This extremism ideology upheld by ISIS is a virus purely stemmed from the Islamic religion by which the name of god “Allah” was used by ISIS militants in killing people. Yet, the world is experiencing difficulty to control the sentiment of religious extremism. Again, this might be perhaps another great issue for 2015.  

In between the issues facing the Middle East, one of the issues that catch everyone’s eyes and fear for the failure of handling is the ongoing nuclear deal between Iran and the West, particularly US. Compared with the prospect of consequences of failure to achieve it, the inhumanity of ISIS can mean little to the impact. To add more variables, the pursue of nuclear arm by Iran is a perceived threat to the world beyond the threat of ISIS in the region. For that, degrading ISIS is as much important as to disarm Iran from a nuclear capability.

In the light of ISIS and its transnational supporters, the laws pertaining to anti-terrorism and immigration have been reviewed accordingly, mostly by the western liberal democratic nations. For this instance, the Sydney hostage siege could happen although Australia has the most comprehensive and strictest anti-terrorism law in the world. In this regard, no nation is immunized from the risk of terrorism or extremism.  

Aside from the odds of what was happened in 2014, a good lesson that teaches us is that the war, conflict, crisis, and catastrophe that separate communities, people and nations are in turn vital elements again that unite the enemy’s hands together.

Overall, the disappearance of MH-370 is not only a disaster for Malaysia nationals but also for the entire industry of aviation and all humanity, and as consequence, the loss was felt throughout the world. The same feeling and sympathy is echoed around the world again when spread the news about the crash of AirAsia. The loss of humanity in 2014 is countless. The truth lies behind all of tragedy, including Malaysia airliners and AirAsia is that there will be no alternative mechanism created for today and tomorrow that can predict in order to avoid the incident. This shows human wisdom and capability is limited. Cyber issue is constantly reminding us of further escalation of tension between countries. Climate change has significantly captured the global attention in this year. This is a great change in sight. 


To conclude the whole events of 2014, hundreds of thousands of lives were lost because of the man-made conflict and crisis, and which can be defined as power, greed, nationalism and extremism. Upholding these evil ideologies will lead us into the trajectory of larger tragedy in the future. Agonizing grief and angst overwhelmed the world of 2014 and thus there is no winner at the end. 

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Migration issues: Fundamental tension between state security and human security

     With 232 million international migrants in the world, according to recent figure released by United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs (UNDESA), migration is one of the most important and pressing global issue of our time (Amrith 2014). Further research into the matter has found that migration is often driven by the search for better livelihoods and new opportunities which is basically challenging for the host countries. Given the weight of challenges, irregular migration, known as asylum seekers and refugees, are highly securitized and therefore contested in policy debate and making (Koser 2005). However, experts argued that migrants provide with economic growth for both of receiving countries [via remittance transfer] and host countries [by filling the gap of labor demand]. This paper thus will briefly argue how state security and human security are in conflict because of migration.  

     To begin with, state is the main actor of providing all opportunities, rights and security for citizens, and border control. So, human security cannot be separated from the operation of states (Barnett & Adger 2007). However, states party to the international Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the international Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination against Women, the Convention on the Rights of the Child must guarantee to anyone who is in their territory and subject to their jurisdiction the rights recognized in those legal instruments (Vietti and Scribner 2013). Accordingly, states ought to abide by international obligations towards migrants in providing security which means protecting fundamental freedoms—freedoms that are the essence of life (Commission on Human Security 2000). In addition, UNDP (1994) popularized the emerging concerns of human security as job security, income security, health and environmental security, security from crime. To protect this whole magnitude of security for migrants means a lot for states and therefore is clashed with the interest of state security. The fundamental reason for states, as could be argued, to limit access to their territories is in fear of those responsibilities for migrants.

     Migration from one country to another has been primarily regulated by the decisions of the sovereign regarding who is allowed into and out of their national boundaries since the emergence of Westphalian state (Vietti and Scribner 2013). However, international migration has increasingly been framed as a security problem in the West after the international terrorist attack on 11 September 2001 (Humphrey 2013). Following this, Western countries are forced to bolster their border defense which is pertinent in line with the right of their sovereignty. In fact, states have a sovereign right to control who crosses their borders and remains on their territory, but irregular or illegal migration challenges this right (Koser 2009). In light of global terrorism threats, failure to tighten state security and border control, the state would be much vulnerable to broader consequences such as threats to its homeland security, public disorder, disease, crime and other resources. At last, government will lose its legitimate power to rule the nation. What is more is the phenomenon of illegal immigration tends to be described as a challenge to state autonomy because frontiers are violated, and the ability of governments to control entry and the shape and composition of migration flows is challenged (Abell 1996).

      In addition, Abell (1996) noted that migration is increasingly portrayed by governments, the media, and analysts in both developed and developing countries as a security threat. Applied to this concern, Australia is increasing counter-terrorism legislation and tightening border control due to its own citizens, who were migrants before naturalizing citizenship, joining terrorist groups and supporting terror groups in the Middle East, justifying this phenomenon as national threat. Regardless, Viettie and Scribner (2013) explained about state power that the goal of securing state security is preeminent with each nation seeking to preserve its integrity and to defend itself against the intrusion of other individuals or state powers intent on asserting their will. Despite all this, states still need to respect human rights and bear in mind that they have international obligations. Thus, the challenge for states is to limit access to their territories without undermining the right to seek and enjoy protection (Koser 2005).

     In the increasingly inter-connected age, migratory movements today are of a mixed nature, including migrants moving for employment or study purposes, people moving from rural to urban settings, refugees and asylum seekers, victims of trafficking or vulnerable persons in an irregular situation, including unaccompanied minor or women at risk (Klaauw 2010). Abell (1996) therefore raised concern that migration has an impact on the security interests of individuals, communities, institutions, countries, and regions, posing unprecedented political, social, and economic problem which can draw the host countries into turmoil. This is vastly happening across the globe. At the paradox, massive flow of migration appears to be chaotic for the host nations by affecting social stability and cohesion, opening doors for transnational terrorists into society, making employment competitive, and crime on the rise at the threat of public security.

     Assessing the above-analysis, what most conflicts caused by migration between the state security and human security seem to be based on the context of security threat and a wider mixed nature. However, the United Nations (UN) and its agencies insist that states party to UN’s protocol and covenants and conventions must stick to their obligations in commitment to carrying out their responsibility to migrants even if exercising their power in defense of national security. Therefore, today migration is much more complex than was expected and thus needs to be scrutinized as it has an immense impact on the host societies.

     In conclusion, nation-states securitize migration in the wake of terrorist attack on 11 September 2001, escalating to limit access to their territories without undermining the right to seek and enjoy protection. On the contrary, the global body, UN (United Nations) and its agencies are urging its member-states to comply with their obligations in the face of the rise of migration. Thus, the state security which is exercised in the context of securitization and human security obligated to provide for citizens and migrants are in inconsistency.

Bibliography

1.     Amrith, Megha 2014, Why Migration Matters, United Nations University, Viewed on 05 November 2014 <http://unu.edu/publications/articles/why-migration-matters.html> .
2.     Koser, Khalid 2005, Irregular migration, state security and human security, Global Commission on International Migration,  Viewed on 05 November 2014 <https://www.iom.int/jahia/webdav/site/myjahiasite/shared/shared/mainsite/policy_and_research/gcim/tp/TP5.pdf > .
3.     Barnett, Jon and Adger, W. Neil 2007, ‘Climate change, human security and violent conflict’, Political geography, University of Melbourne, No. 26, pp. 639-655.
4.      Veitti, Francesca & Scribner, Todd 2013, ‘Human Security: Understanding international migration from human security perspective’, Journal on migration and human security, New Yor, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 17-31.
5.     Klaauw, van der Johannes 2010, ‘Refugee Rights in times of mixed migration: Evolving status and protection issues’, Refugee Journal Quarterly, Oxford University, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 59-86.
6.     Humphrey, Michael 2013, ‘Migration, Security and Insecurity’, Journal of Intercultural studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 178-195. 

7.     Abell, Nazere Albuquerque 1996, ‘The impact of international migration on security and stability’, Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 83-109. 

Thursday, October 23, 2014

How significant is modern terrorism as a threat to international security and peace?

Introduction

     The concerted efforts in fight of terrorism at home and abroad worldwide are significantly increasing following the US-led international Coalition started degrading the Islamic State terrorist in the Middle East. Based on thorough examination, terrorism is deeply embedded in ideology which can be religiously, politically and self motivated. History has shown that there are state sponsored terrorism, non-state terrorism and religiously motivated terrorism. Of these three types of terrorism manifested, it is necessary in this paper to evaluate the ideological drive of religiously motivated terrorist organizations which are the most triumphantly rampant across the global, and how they pose directly threats to the international peace and security. For instance, although the recent terror attack of Malaysia airline in Ukraine was justified more as political motivation, the ISIS, known as Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, can be said to be motivated by religious extremism by their own advertisement, have captured much of global attention. These acts of terrorism are in fact confined into the added subject of a wider argument locally and internationally, because this Islamic terrorist groups vastly threaten the global peace and security in way of recruiting thousands of foreign fighters who have become citizens of many western countries and providing them with training with an aim to stagger terror attacks around the world.

     Given the brutality and will to kill the innocent civilians by ISIS group, Buko Haram and other Islamic extremist militants, terrorism is highly alarming, forcing to question the pivot of international business, peace and security due to the vast epidemic of their members beyond national borders and further concern over the growth of homegrown terrorists. The Islamic militancy in the region of the Middle East and South Asia, from which the threat to the international business, peace and security originates, launched the 9/11 attack is the most viable example in this regard. Centred on the Islamic religiously motivated terrorism, this paper, therefore, will critically evaluate the root cause of ideological inspiration, and the significant effects of transnational terrorists, and how modern terrorism poses threats to international community.   

How terrorism is defined scholarly;

     It is important to understand the definition of terrorism defined by scholars, agreeing that there is no precise definition for terrorism, but it is commonly interpreted as the premeditated, systematic threat or use of violence by subnational groups to attain a political, religious, or ideological objective through intimidation of a large audience (Alexander, Carlton & Wilkinson 1979).1 In this vein, the political scientist, Victoroff (2006)2 however contended that the only viable goal is to influence a target audience and affect its behavior in ways that serve the interests of terrorist. In view of the above, the terrorists are known to be non-state actors, and understood to harm the ordinary people and treating people whose ideology and faith-based doctrine contradicts to theirs as an enemy and annihilated. Furthermore, investigated the aspects of terrorism by Alan O’Day (1979)3, the findings have been meant for the use of threat of violence to intimidate a group of people or government for political ends. This view, in short, reflects to much of what is happening in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.

Background History and Central Ideology of Islamic Terrorism;

     From the Zealots in the first century AD to the Red Brigades, the Palestine Liberation Organization, the Irish Republican Army, the Tamil Tigers, and others in more recent times, terrorism has been a tactic used by the weak in an effort to produce political change. Like violent crime, deadly disease, and other scourges, it can be reduced and contained. But it cannot be totally eliminated (Gordon, Phillip. H 2007)4. Then Barry Davies (2003)5 identified types of terrorism as left wing, right wing, nationalist, state-sponsored, anarchist and religious. At its root, acts of terrorism are not committed with the intention of simply causing misfortune to individuals; they are committed to instill fear and threaten the civil liberties of the masses. Nonetheless, the outcome of the search for the reason and motive of terrorist attacks may differ from time to time and from event to event according to Saroj Kumar (2012).6

     Terrorism is in fact not a new phenomenon. There are about sixty international terrorist groups currently active around the world, with four countries, such as, Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria named as state sponsors accordingly the U.S Department of State7, of these more than half are religiously motivated, and most of them are Islamic terrorist groups. Although no religion encourages extreme physical violence, but promote tranquility and harmony, many terrorist groups are being motivated by their religious belief. In this respect, Osama bin Ladin’s Al-Qaida network is the prime example of religious terrorism, claimed Barry. And the ISIL Jihadism group is following the suit.

     Central to the argument, Hayat Alvi (2014)8, who is the Middle East expert, substantially explained the Salafi and Wahhabi ideologies which are believed to be key contributors of exporting the Islamic extremism associated with Islamic terrorist organizations in the Middle East, Eastern Africa and South Asia (Afghanistan and Pakistan) on the following;  
  •      Salafism; an ideology and reform movement calling for a return to traditional Islam as it was practiced and observed in the days of Prophet Muhammad and his circle of Companions. In Arabic, “salaf” means predecessors, forebearers, ancestors, forefathers.
  •     Wahhabism; originated in Saudi Arabia, where it is still the national ideology of the theocracy for more than two centuries, has been Saudi Arabia’s dominant faith, upholding a belief that those who do not practice their form of Islam are heathens and enemies. 

     These ideologies fiercely reject any notion of flexibility in Islam, instead embracing the concept of jihad by which they view the world through this lens. Both are believed to have inspired Islamic extremism and militancy worldwide, including the likes of Al Qaeda and Osama bin Ladin. Consistent with this ideology, terrorist are not people who have noting to live for, but they are people who believe in something so strongly that they are willing to die for, argued Saroj Kumar. For example, the use of the name of god, Allah  by Islamic terrorists when running an ideological campaign via social media and beheading, killing their victims comes into what appears to be inspired by this cancerous ideology. More importantly, this religious-based ideology is employed as a tool to inspire Muslims living in Western countries when recruiting and that is a substantial concern for global community as to the role it plays.

The Modern Means and Weapons of Terrorism

     One of the most effective means for terrorist organizations, as scholars suggest, is to exploit the failed or weak state so that they could establish a safe haven for the purpose of strengthening their survival strategy and using all resources available in order to run their targeted operations. Such is the overt strategy apparently used by Al Qaeda, ISIL militants and other groups in the Middle East. By and large, the failure of states can be defined as for the primal cause. Regardless, simply put, Nazli (2014)9 observed that the state’s vulnerability is a function of two attributes of transnational terrorism: non-hierarchical organizations and informational advantage over the state. Hence, the collapse of regimes or governments in the region significantly opens a wide door for which the terrorist organizations penetrate into society at large. Because the immediate rise of ISIS onto the international stage, according to Kurt Eichenwald10 has evinced the above claim that the Islamic State, known as ISIS took advantage of weaknesses created by civil war in Syria and governing incompetence in Iraq to grab control of lands and establish itself as a credible force.

     Another best weapon for the said terrorist organizations is of the modern technology evolved as terrorists apparently use social media unlike before. On this issue, Barry Davies also critiqued that the evolved technology, particularly the modern media and the internet, has fuelled unprecedented know-how of technical and information skills required to carry out operations worldwide and unconditionally help the terrorist organizations enable to contact with others for joint operations efficiently and effectively. Plenty of media reports and what have been seen lately about the terrorists using social media as a means of recruiting new members is a serious action needed to tackle by the international community. That is why the internet and social media become an unparalleled platform for the terrorist groups and thus a great challenge for governments to solve nowadays.

Effects Upon Transnational Borders

     The information technology has effectively made a global connection in which much of global threats are posed by modern terrorists. Modern terrorism is inundated with new skills shaped by new technology, and therefore the international community is far greater at risk than before. Shifting sole ideology may help reduce terrorism. Otherwise, these groups will remain potent threats. Some scholars believe that terrorism can be domestically ended by looking at the successful experiences of military forces deployed by Russian military and Turkish military against Chechen and PKK terrorist groups.11 Despite this, the world is in reverse witnessing the increasingly growing of Islamic terrorist groups years after years.

     On contrary, scholars also puts insight in light of threats exposed by transnational terrorism that it is not likely to vanish in the near future as the international linkages (e.g., trade, global production networks, refugee flows) and modern means of communication are expected to contribute to a more rapid spread of violence across borders, which may increase the politicoeconomic vulnerability of societies to terrorism.12 Because of this, it is unlikely possible to dim the light of transnational terrorism, as argued Brynjar Lia (2007)13, unless the teaching or promoting of Islamic extremism ideology via the social media and the internet is well managed, monitored or stopped. As for example, Islamic clerics promoting hatred against other religions are more prominent through social media nowadays. At most, the core danger of the religiously motivated terrorism lies on the ground of such hatred-based ideology as it treats people with different faith as an enemy. With this becoming a living agent for these groups, many join decidedly ISIS instead of pursuing their personal careers, though being born in Western developed countries.  

     Analyzing the contemporary threat of international terrorism in the context of Australia, the current threat of terrorism is generally associated with so-called Islamist or Jihadi terrorism, although the usage of both terms is controversial. The 2010 Counter-Terrorism White Paper of the Australian Government stated that the main source of international terrorism and the primary terrorist threat to Australia and Australian interests today comes from people who follows distorted and militant interpretation of Islam that calls for violence as the answer to perceived grievances (DPMC 2010:8)14. And these groups are, it is safe to say, simultaneously threatening the peace and security enjoyed by international community.

     Assessing the threats of modern terrorism by all of the above-mentioned accounts, including media reports on a daily basis, modern terrorism is virtually on the rise rather than decreasing. For this reason, the violence caused by modern terrorism will disrupt business, peace and challenge security in the future as none of any terrorist groups are effectively terminated until to date. Then, the religiously motivated terrorist organizations will lead again the role in future terrorism as there is no mechanism that can keep the ideology under control. In addition, the attempt to degrading modern terrorism appears to be fought hard as it requires moderating the extreme ideologies and critically managing social media, internet, and all of other advanced technology. And only when the mechanism is constructed and implemented, then there appears to have the feasible future of ending modern terrorism.

     In conclusion, the ideological inspiration for religiously motivated terrorist organizations are mainly focused along with the means of modern terrorism and how social media and internet are used as a good weapon for their ideological campaign and recruiting those who living in Western developed countries which are links to posing threats to international peace and security. At last, the attempt to fight modern terrorism and its threats to the international community seems to be extremely difficult and costly. That the international  business, peace and security are at risk unless the principal root of religious [Islamic] extremism ideology can be effectively in control or transformed into moderate, for it is the most significant source of producing transnational terrorists through the social media and internet.

Bibliographies :

1. Alexander, Carltorn & Wilkinson 1979, Westview special studies in national and international studies; Terrorism: Theory and Practice, Worldview press, New York, pp. 247-271.

2. Horgan, John, Victoroff (eds) 2005, ‘Tangled Roots: Social and Psychological factors in the genesis of terrorism’, Washington DC, IOS Press, pp. 74-84.  

3. O’Day, Alan 1979, Northern Ireland, Terrorism and the British State; Terrorism: Theory and Practice, Westview press, New York, pp. 121-134.

4. Country Reports On Terrorism 2013, US State Department, accessed at  http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2013/index.htm on 15 September 2014.

5. Davies, Barry 2003, Terrorism: Inside a World Phenomenon, Virgin Boooks Ltd, London, pp 28, 31.

6. Rath, Saroj Kumar 2012, ‘Root cause of terrorism: A brief survey of South Asia’, Expert property, Social Research report, vol 21, pp. 23-34

7. Gordon, Phillip. H 2007, Can the War of Terror Be Won?; How to fight the right War, Council on Foreign Affairs, November/December issue, accessed at http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/63009/philip-h-gordon/can-the-war-on-terror-be-won on 15 September 2014.

8. Alvi, Hayat 2014, ‘The diffusion of Intra-Islamic Violence and Terrorism: The Impact of The Proliferation of Salafi/Wahhabi Ideologies’, Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 38-49.

9. Avdan, Nazli 2014, ‘Controlling Access to Territory: Economic Interdependence, Transnational Terrorism, and Visa Policies’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp- 592-624.

10. Eichenwald, Kurt 2014, ‘ISIS will fall’, Newsweek Global, Vol. 163, Issue 11, pp 12-15.
G. Jones, Seth 2007, ‘The End of Terrorism’; Annual Conference Papers, American Political Science Association, Washington DC, pp. 2-39

11. Schneider, Friedrich, Bruck, Tilman & Meirerrieks, Daniel 2014, The Economics of Counterterroriusm: A Survey, Journal of Economics Surveys, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Vol. 00, No. 0, pp. 1-27.

12. Lia, Brynjar 2007, Architect of Global Jihad: The Life of al-Qaida Strategist Abu Mus’ab al-Suri, Hurst & Company, London, pp. 347-439.


13. Australian Government, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Securing Australia, Protecting our Community, Counter-Terrorism White Paper 2010, accessed at http://www.dpmc.gov.au/publications/counter_terrorism/index.cfm on 23 September 2014. 

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Policy Brief: School Funding Policy Debate for November Election 2014 in Victoria

       Funding is essential for schools to properly manage the schools where formal education is learnt and taught. It is a vehicle to mobilize basic education for social, economic and technological development. Also, funding is needed to tackle the reforms and challenges facing the schools. Therefore, school funding is a primary source for education which plays a vital role in the rapidly changing environment of our daily lifestyle. Education is part of a very crucial engine for the mobility of the today fast-paced advancement. It is also known as a driving-force in building and shaping a nation. For it is the pillar of the holistic growth. With that being mentioned, the education sector in Victoria accounts for over 5% of the State’s GDP and education services are Victoria’s strongest export according to the State of Victoria Economic Review1. Having acknowledged the importance of its economic output, it is likely impossible for Victoria to continue running the state schools by the state capacity alone without the funding supported by the federal government. In a political sense, school funding is always and everywhere already a political project2 because it is the political agenda. This essay, however, will seek to weighing out the policies relating to the school funding from both of the Liberal and Labor parties, media reports and assessment reviews in ways that which party has better policy, including polls collected.

       This November election will be slightly different from the previous years as a funding issue, it is guessed, might have a big say in the final account, not because of the state government’s failure to increase funding, but the controversial budget cuts by the federal Coalition government. For this reason, it is a high time for Victorians to drum up the political anxiety while the election is underway. So, the public debate and argument over who, the Liberal or the ALP parties are more credible to take up the role of education in the state, are heating up.

       Necessarily going back to the pre-election periods in 2013, the Coalition government of Victoria vowed to uphold commitment to school funding sticking to the Gonski reform introduced by the then-Labor government. But, the political storm was soon changed when announced the federal budget reform in May, particularly, for higher education. That it instills the public perception with a wider complex scenario of concern is increasingly growing for the fact that the cuts might bring about a massive negative impact on the future educational opportunities available to all students irrespective of their backgrounds. For a repercussion, the budget cut is heralding a wide array of resistances from the opposition party, other organizations across the country, including university students. Besides, the added media coverage and educational expert comments on the issue is a surplus.
                                                                                    
       Napthine government in Victoria appears to get inclined to the policy guidelines outlined by the Coalition during the pre-election era in 20133. There are no significant changes afterward,  even at the high drama of post election. In the message recently written by Martin Dixon, minister for education in August, 2014 on the report of Professional Practice and Performance for Improved Learning: School governance reflects the position of the Liberal party for school funding4. Mr Martin Dixon contends that his government is focusing on how high each individual student can be improved by mounting the funding. Regardless, the funding is also meant for expanded areas that include the quality of school governance, greater autonomy and other practices. Highly focused on the stimulus of student performance appears to be single-minded while many yearn for holistic progress. 

       In a much-anticipated Victorian budget reply towards budget cutting that the federal government claimed as reform, Daniel Andrew clearly fell short of either delivering strategic platforms or a reliable policy in such a way that people are convinced for a better change, instead his reply is narrowly focused upon upgrading school facilities rather than how the school system needs to be restructured through the funding5.  

       Amidst the opposition attack on the budget, the Coalition has frequently boosted an additional school funding in several areas across the state with policies criticizing the failed policy of former Labor government. The Coalition’s policy laid out is to have long-term commitment in the case of restructuring education6. As such, they emphasize on schools to have greater autonomy in terms of governance, enhancing school performance and students’ outcomes. On this basis, the Coalition seems to have a clearer clue of what it takes to a nationwide educational reform in an attempt to create the best possible opportunity for all students with less bureaucratic control from Canberra paving ways for self-management and administration. Because an increased funding without the clear strategy and policy would not make sense for all, but a disaster for all. 

       What is certain at this point in time is that Victoria like other states in Australia can not survive, manage themselves without the influx of the funding from the federal government. Given that assumption, Victoria state, under Gonski funding program in 2013, had an agreement signed with the federal government while Labor was in power to seal school funding for the next six years. Nonetheless, Mr Pyne, federal minister for education, dwindled the commitment to only four years. Although Pyne repeatedly reaffirmed to provide a new alternative model of school funding at the end of four year commitment to Gonski funding model, he is still suspected to work on decreasing fundings. Yet, for Victorians, it is relaxed getting reassurance from the state minister, Martin Dixon on this matter, claiming that the Liberal party has negotiated $ 12.2 billion school funding for over the next six years (Preiss Benjamin, 2013)7. In this regard, it is good to note that the same party with the same principle will surely have the same kind of policy interest.

       In a recent development, there have been reports suggesting that the Liberal is intensifying to increase funding for which it can be said for election purpose8. Central to their ideological campaign, “The Better Schools Plan” is a policy branded for the Liberal-led Napthine government in the lead-up to November election. Technically speaking, Liberal has superiority in strategy than by Labor because the Labor’s policy is less convincing. In a media release from state education minister, the Napthine government is building a better education system, with a record of 9.2 billion for school education in 2014-15, 1 billion up more than in Labor’s last budget10.

       However, one of the most viable strategies currently used by Labor in the fight of the Liberal is budget scrapping, a policy by which they draw public attention to some extent. The budget cuts that Labor believes have a knock-on effect on educational programs ranging from Reading recovery to the School Start bonus11. James Merlino, a Shadow minister for education accused of the Napthine government for failing to abide in Labor’s educational reform which means Gonski funding model. School funding is apparently a critical component of the election as is echoed in the campaign of James Merlino pledging further 10 million funding upgrade for Daylesford if won the November election12.

       In addressing the specific details of what the Labor committed to the funding, the following two standpoints can be summed up as the core strategy of Labor party13;
·       Committed to continue to fund government school via the student resource package (base, per capita and disadvantage amounts)
·       Committed to continue to fund government school in accordance with the financial assistance model.

       The advantage that the Labor enjoys is that Labor party has a history of popularity in Victoria.
But in respect of making strong policy over school funding, Labor is somehow weaker as it is suspected that they fail to set out new ideology in challenging the Liberal, but too much credit is given to Gonski model. Even so, Meredith Peace, Victorian branch president of the Australian Education Union, is apparently sided with Labor on the ground of decrying for increased funding in line with the AEU’s assessment14. The notion is that even if both parties are willing to double up the school funding, the question of how the funding will be spent is far more important to determine voting. That is why Labor policy makers are in need of a much stronger policy structured in order to sway the public, knowing that it is hard to be a winner without it.

     Assessing the policies of both parties, which is thought to have done consultation with stakeholders across the state, the Liberal party is construed to have better policy so far. To be true, school funding, by all accounts so far, is a highly contested issue between the two parties. Though being armed with technical superiority, the latest polls indicate that the Napthine government is facing the daunting task14. Therefore, it is the Liberal that may lead again in this election. At last not the least, to compete in the globalized education market, there is a massive need for the bipartisan support in the making of educational reform as a whole.

       In conclusion, the November election will be critical to both of the contesting parties as their policies and strategies are displayed as much possible as they could through the electronic media and their official websites. And the recent high drama of political campaigns shows that school funding is highly politicized. The two parties seem to have the same passion in terms of increasing funding, but what matters in the final is always about how much their displayed policy win over the public. Therefore, a party with the ability to organize stronger policy would have merit. Thus, it is a good time for the state to invest in the education and construct the long-term feasible policy for a state education system with a purpose of getting on top of the world in the future.   


Reference :

1.     Morsy Leila, Gulson K; Clarke, Mathew 2013, ‘Democracy, sector-blindness and the Deletigimation of dissent in neoliberal education policy: a response to 34(2) May 2013’, Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, School of Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, vol. 35, no. 3, pp 444-461.

2.     Review of Higher Education in Regional and City Development 2012, OECD Australia, viewed 27 August 2014, <http://www.oecd.org/edu/imhe/40139266.pdf>

3.     The Coalition’s Policy for schools 2013, Liberal party, viewed 27 August 2014  <http://www.liberal.org.au/latest-news/2013/08/29/coalitions-policy-schools-putting-students-first>

4.     Report of Department of Education for Early Childhood Development 2014, ‘Professional Practice and Performance for Improved Learning: School governance’, State Government of Victoria, viewed 28 August 2014, <http://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/about/department/professionalpractice.pdf>

5.     Daniel Andrew 2014, ‘Victorian Budget Reply’, Labor Party, viewed 28 August 2014 <http://www.danielandrews.com.au/news/2014-victorian-budget-reply>

6.     Dannis Napthine 2014, ‘Andrew tries to take Victorian for mug on School’, Liberal party,  viewed 28 August 2014 <http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/10565-andrews-tries-to-take-victorians-for-mugs-on-schools>

7.     Benjamin Preiss 2014, The Age, ‘State schools set to struggle in 2014 as principals brand additional funding ‘inadequate’’, The Age, viewed 28 August 2014.

8.     Benjamin Preiss 2013, Sydney Morning Herald, ‘States furious over double backlip on Gonski funding’, Sydney Morning Herald, viewed 28 August 2014, <http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/states-furious-over-double-backflip-on-gonski-funding-20131126-2y881.html>

9.     James Merlino 2014, ‘Napthine’s Budget wont’s fix our schools’, Labor Party, Daniel Andrew, viewed 28 August 2014  <http://www.danielandrews.com.au/media/releases/napthine%E2%80%99s-budget-won%E2%80%99t-fix-our-schools/>

10.Premier of Victoria, Media release, viewed 29 August 2014, <http://www.appa.asn.au/president/Win-for-Victorian-schools.pdf>

11.  Australian Broadcasting Corporation 2014, ALP pledges $ 10m for Daylesford school revamp, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, viewed 29 August 2014, <http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-16/alp-pledges-10m-for-daylesford-school-revamp/5600098>

12.  Victorian Labor Platform 2014, Policy Paper, Victorian Labor, viewed 29 August 2014, < http://www.viclabor.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Victorian-Labor-Platform-2014.pdf>

13.  The Poll Bludger 2014, Crikey, Viewed 06 September 2014, http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2014/08/24/newspoll-55-45-to-labor-in-victoria-5/


14.  Meredith Peace 2014, The Sydney Morning Herald ‘ALP must program for success in schools’, Sydney Morning Herald, viewed 03 September 2014, <http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/alp-must-program-for-success-in-schools-20140728-zxm2p.html>